CONCUR
PUBLICATIONS
CONCUR
has helped to resolve a wide range of disputes,
including cases involving water, fisheries, forests, land use,
wetlands, endangered species protection, facility siting, toxic
waste clean-up, health risk, flood control and cross-cultural
conflicts involving indigenous and developing country communities.
To document and learn from the variety of cases we facilitate
and mediate, we at CONCUR regularly write working papers, journal
articles, and book chapters, as well as speak as conference
presenters and guest lecturers. Please see our selected list
of publications below.
CD
Compilations
Books
Working Papers
Reprints
Teaching
Notes
Other
Publications and Reports
Resource
Guide
How to
Order:
Working Papers are free and can be downloaded below in PDF. For
other publications (reprints/books), download the printable Publications
Order Form (PDF or Word),
and note which publications you'd like to purchase as well as
the shipping cost. Item
numbers are located below the publication description. Please
complete the form and then print out and email, mail or fax your
order to:
CONCUR,
Inc.
1832
Second Street
Berkeley,
CA 94710
FAX:
(510) 649-1980
info@concurinc.net
Payment
options:
Please mail a check or money order made payable to CONCUR, Inc.
with your order form. For credit card payments, please send payment
via www.PayPal.com to info@concurinc.net
AFTER submitting your order form. Orders will be shipped when
payment is received.
|
CONCUR
Publications CDs Order
Form
We
are now offering two CD compilations:
CD-05-02:
CD-CONCUR's Teaching Notes and Resource Guide - The Teaching
Notes are a comprehensive, step-by-step guide to environmental
conflict resolution. The Resource Guide is a compiled list
of teaching institutions, professional organizations, books,
articles, journals and newsletters relevant to the field of
environmental dispute resolution. Both the Teaching Notes
and Resource Guide are extremely useful for practitioners,
students, and anyone involved in environmental negotiation,
facilitation or mediation. This CD is $20.00, including
shipping and handling.
CD-05-03:
CONCUR Articles and Working Papers - These publications
discuss key elements of our cases, including the techniques
and professional practices used in complex multi-party negotiations.
This CD includes CONCUR's most important articles and working
papers to-date on a wide range of topics relative to the field.
This CD is $30.00, including shipping and handling.
Both
CDs can be purchased together for $40.00, including shipping
and handling - order publication number CD-05-01.
 |
PR-94-01
Overcoming Obstacles in Environmental Policymaking. Creating
Partnerships Through Mediation. John K. Gamman. 1994.
State University of New York Press. |
Examines
why policies and laws intended to protect the environment
often do not work. In particular, Gamman
addresses the fundamental reasons why efforts to protect natural
resources in the developing world generally fail. Recommends
a new open model of decision making to strengthen environmental
decision making.
|
| PR-94-01
Hardback |
|
$29.95 |
|
| PR-94-01
Paperback |
|
$18.95 |
|
"Case
6: Resolving Science-Intensive Public Policy Disputes: Reflections
on the New York Bight Initiative." Scott T. McCreary,
pp. 829-858, from The Consensus Building Handbook: A
Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement, edited
by Lawrence Susskind, Sarah McKearnan, and Jennifer Thomas
Larmer. Published by Sage Publications, 1999.
Reports
on a model study of the use of joint fact-finding techniques
to help resolve complex environmental issues. The substantive
focus of the Bight Initiative was the issue of managing PCBs
in the ocean region adjacent to New York Harbor known as the
New York Bight. This chapter authored by Scott
McCreary is one of 17 case studies, which complements
seventeen chapters on specific topics in Consensus Building.
The
Consensus Building Handbook is available through www.amazon.com,
$195.00. Or you may call Sage Publications directly at 805-499-9774
or visit their website at www.sagepub.com.
Working
Papers
Observations
from Mediated Cases: How Organizations and Relationships Can
Transform to Implement New Environmental Policies. John K.
Gamman, Ph.D. and Scott T. McCreary, Ph.D.
This
Working Paper is a collection of some the personal reflections
of Principals John Gamman and Scott McCreary, drawing from
several complex environmental policy cases they have mediated
over the last 20 years. The paper discusses how common obstacles
to more effective negotiating can be overcome, by both individuals
and organizations, to allow them to make the transformation
required by the demands of new environmental policies. Topics
include: how to deal with conflict within your own organization
in order to create a cohesive external negotiating strategy;
the impact of withholding crucial information during a negotiation;
how focusing on the needs of others creates more value to
be claimed in a negotiation.
|
| WP-09-01 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
Finding
Solutions for the Cleanup of the Largest Land-Based Oil Spill
in the United States: Utilizing a Neutral, Expert, Fact-Fiding
Panel in the Guadalupe Oil Field Mediation. John K. Gamman,
Scott. T. McCreary, Steve Lustgarden.
CONCUR
mediated the Guadalupe Oil Field (GOF) mediation process involving
the characterization and cleanup of a 3000-acre former oil field
in coastal California. The GOF mediation is a highly complex,
science-intensive case marked by enormous technical and scientific
uncertainty. In addition, the oil field possesses environmental
values of national significance, including several endangered
species and wetland, coastal, and riparian resources. In this
paper, we describe CONCUR's facilitation of the Pilot Test Panel
(PTP), a neutral fact-finding panel of three experts in oil
spill cleanup technologies which is part of the GOF mediation.
Our aim in this paper is to inform readers interested in Alternative
Dispute Resolution (ADR) of the opportunities and obstacles
in utilizing a neutral panel for the purpose of joint fact-finding
in a scientifically and technically complex case. |
| WP-01-01 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
|
An
Initial Look at Prospects for Using Mediation to Resolve Coastal
Resource Management Disputes in Israel. Scott McCreary. Presented
at the Workshop on Environment, Dispute, and Conflict Resolution,
January 20-22, 1999.
Examines
the sources of complexity in coastal resource management disputes
nationally and internationally. Presents a brief case study
of mediation-based planning for the Tijuana Estuary Research
Reserve at the U.S.-Mexico Border. Poses questions to initiate
a national dialogue on resolution of coastal land use conflicts
in Israel. |
|
WP-99-01 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
Participation
and Representation in Environmental Decision Making in the
Pacific Rim: Reflections on Negotiation-Based Models of Practice.
Scott McCreary with the assistance of Bennett Brooks, Austin
McInerny and Kym Garrett. Presented at the Conference on Democratic
Design and Planning for the Pacific Rim, June 24, 1999.
Presents
four propositions to frame a cross-cultural discussion about
the potential scope of participation in planning and design
disputes. Examines the role of planners and designers and the
relative merits of convening structured negotiation processes. |
|
WP-99-02 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
Mediated
Joint Fact-Finding as a Strategy for Resolving Environmental
Policy Disputes: Facilitated Independent Scientific Review
of the CALFED Water Conservation Goals. Scott McCreary, Bennett
Brooks and Roberta Borgonovo. Presented at the SCMA 1999 Annual
Conference, Malibu, California, October 30, 1999.
Contested
technical information often underlies environmental policy disputes.
This presentation highlights mediated joint fact-finding as
a strategy for building understanding and resolving technically
complex issues. |
|
WP-99-03 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
|
Challenges
in Contracting for Environmental Dispute Resolution. Scott
McCreary, Prepared for the NCCM Panel, January 15, 1993.
Describes
necessary preconditions for successful contracting. The paper
reviews advantages and disadvantages posed by different types
of project opportunities. |
|
WP-93-01 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
A
First Look Back at the San Francisco Estuary Project. Scott
T. McCreary and Cornelia Tietke, Submitted to Coastal Zone
'93, March 2, 1993.
Details
the components of the SFEP's Comprehensive Conservation and
management plan, including its consensus-building aspects. The
paper suggests some criteria for weighing the project's effectiveness. |
|
WP-93-02 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
Can
Mediation Help Resolve Napa County's Top Ten Public Policy
Disputes? Scott McCreary and Chuck Meibeyer. Based on a presentation
at the Napa Mediation Week Reception, April 22, 1993.
Focuses
on the possibilities of using mediation and mutual gains bargaining
to resolve ten of Napa County's public policy disputes, which
are fairly typical of local land use issues. |
|
WP-93-03 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
Advice
to City Attorneys: Choosing a Mediator to Help Resolve Disputes
Involving Local Land Use, Environmental, and Public Policy
Decisions. Scott T. McCreary, John K. Gamman and Martha Neuman.
Presented to the League of California Cities 95th Annual Conference
October 18, 1993.
Gives
city attorneys practical advice in deciding when to initiate
mediation, what kinds of qualifications to seek in recruiting
a mediator, and the kinds of steps to build into a mediation
process. The paper includes questions to use in choosing a mediator
and outlines several specific roles for city attorneys. |
|
WP-93-04 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
A
Prototype System for Classifying Watersheds in the San Francisco
Estuary Region. Scott McCreary, Josh Langenthal, Martha Neuman,
Merrill Buice and Bonita Warren. September 27, 1993.
Presents
the results of a watershed classification exercise undertaken
for the San Francisco Estuary Project. Using specific data about
the San Francisco Estuary. Illustrates the classification and
ranking methodology and the results it yields. Outlines the
rationale for classification and describes the methodology,
findings, conclusions, and recommendations. |
|
WP-93-05 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
|
Regional
Solutions to Environmental Problems: Strategies for Overcoming
Institutionalized Nimbyism. Scott McCreary, John Gamman, and
Martha Neuman. Presented to the San Francisco Planning and
Urban Research Association (SPUR), October 6, 1993.
Presented
to the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association
(SPUR) this paper reviews some challenges in California Environmental
Policy Making, characterizes the fragmented nature of Bay Area
Environmental Management, and also characterizes some subregional
initiatives that show promise in breaking institutional deadlocks. |
|
WP-93-07 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
Mediating
a Statewide Environmental Dispute in Louisiana. Scott T. McCreary
and John K. Gamman, Submitted to Consensus Newsletter, Harvard
Program on Negotiation, March 15, 1992.
Discusses
the process by which the landmark Louisiana Environmental Action
Plan was created and ratified. This comparative risk project
used mediation techniques to name and rank Louisiana's 35 most
pressing environmental issues. All parties to the negotiation
signed the final agreement. |
|
WP-92-01 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
Using
Case Studies of Actual Negotiations to Evaluate Dispute Resolution
and to Design More Effective Dispute Resolution Systems, Scott
T. McCreary. September 22, 1992.
A
3-page paper fully described by its title. Includes a table
of criteria for evaluating the success of public policy mediation. |
|
WP-92-02 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
Ratification
of Informal Agreements and Their Linkage to Formal Binding
Agreements. Scott McCreary, John Gamman, and Cornelia Tietke,
December 9, 1992.
Discusses
the need for a ratification step to bring the mediation process
to a logical conclusion. Using two examples it shows how informal
agreements can be translated into binding agreements. Finally,
it provides advice for mediators and facilitators. |
|
WP-92-03 |
|
DOWNLOAD
PDF HERE |
|
"Science-based
and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning:
a successful case study from north central California".
Gleason, Mary, Scott McCreary, Melissa Miller-Henson, John
Ugoretz, Evan Fox, Matt Merrifield, Will McClintock, Paulo
Serpa, Kathryn Hoffman. In Ocean & Coastal Management
53 (2010) 52-68. January 2010.
CONCUR
Principal Scott McCreary co-authored this article with Marine
Life Protection Act Initiative colleagues. In documenting
the Initiative's North Central Coast Regional Stakeholder
Group process, the article highlights enabling factors, strategic
principles and key decision support elements that accounted
for a successful collaborative planning process. One of first
peer-reviewed articles to document planning for a network
of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), the authors link the rich
case study to published literature on conservation biology
and public policy mediation. Full reprints of the published
article are available for download/purchase via
the journal publisher. You may also contact
CONCUR for a copy of the pre-print version of the paper.
|
|
R-10-01 |
|
|
|
Better
Together: Mediating and End to Ecological Risk Assessment
Dispute at Vandenberg Air Force Base. Eric Poncelet and Gary
Widman. January 14, 2002.
Originally published on mediate.com. |
|
| R-02-01 |
|
$9.00 |
|
Applying
a Mediated Negotiation Framework to Integrated Coastal Zone
Management. Scott T. McCreary et. al. May 4, 2000.
Published
in Coastal Management Journal, 29(3):183-216, 2001. Presents
a typology to classify the way coastal management literature
addresses conflict resolution. Describes the need for detailed
case studies on the use of alternative dispute resolution to
solve complex coastal issues with multiple parties. Presents
two case studies of CONCURÕs work as a neutral mediator to resolve
issues using a formal stepwise model emphasizing stakeholder
analysis, joint fact-finding and single text negotiation.
|
| R-01-01 |
|
$9.00 |
|
Using
Independent Scientific Review to Strengthen Public Participation
in Environmental Decision-Making in the Pacific Rim
Presented
at the Third Conference on Participatory Design and Planning
for the Pacific Rim Ching-Be, Matzu Island, Taiwan. May 28-30,
2001. The rapid pace of economic growth and urbanization
in the Pacific Rim2 has led to a growing strain upon ecological
and cultural resources. As governments and members of the
public attempt to address this dynamic, they must search for
new decision-making tools that serve to decrease the stress
upon the resource base and reduce the conflicts among the
affected stakeholders3. Governments in nations such as Taiwan
and Japan have recently created new processes for environmental
decision-making, many of which include a public participation
component (Hester, 1999). We argue that a public participation
component should create an open forum for the introduction,
clarification, discussion and accessibility of all of the
most current and legitimate resource-related information.
|
| R-01-02 |
|
$9.00 |
|
Using
Joint Fact-Finding to Level the Playing Field in Environmental
Mediation.
Presented
at the Association for Conflict Resolution conference in Toronto,
Ontario. October 11th, 2001.
|
| R-01-03 |
|
$9.00 |
|
Refining
and Testing Joint Fact-Finding for Environmental Dispute Resolution:
Ten Years of Success. Scott T. McCreary, John K. Gamman, et.al.
May 4, 2000.
Published
in Mediation Quarterly, Volume 18 (4). Describes the advantages
of joint fact-finding techniques over the more traditional "blue
ribbon panel" and "adversary science" models. Describes how
to implement joint-fact finding techniques. Finally, the paper
suggests means for linking the results of the joint fact-finding
process to a final agreement. Summarizes CONCURÕs use of the
technique in several cases. |
| R-00-01 |
|
$9.00 |
|
Bioregional Conflict Resolution: Rebuilding Community in Watershed
Planning and Organizing. John Gamman, Michael Vincent McGinnis,
and John Woolley. Environmental Management, pp. 1-12. July
1999.
Characterizes
the valued-based conflicts that watershed managers are likely
to face in planning. The authors propose that utilizing collaborative
decision-making strategies is important, but successful long-term
watershed planning requires rebuilding a community-based infrastructure
that can support important social and bioregional networks and
partnerships. |
| R-99-01 |
|
$4.00 |
|
How
Can Joint Fact-Finding Help Coastal Management: Facilitated
Independent Scientific Review of the CALFED Agricultural Water
Conservation Goals. Scott T. McCreary and Tom Gohring. From
Coastal Zone 99: Abstracts of Presentations, July 27-29, 1999,
pp. 99-101. Edited by Urban Harbors Institute University of
Massachusetts Boston, 1998.
Presented
at Coastal Zone '99. Tracks the development and execution of
a joint fact-finding process to craft an agreement on water
conservation as part of the CALFED Water Use Efficiency Program.
Written from the dual standpoints of an agency convenor and
a nonpartisan facilitator. |
|
R-99-02 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Lessons
From The San Francisco Estuary: Four Rounds Of Action. Scott
McCreary. From The Proceedings of the Conference on the Future
of the Sanbanze Wetlands, Tokyo Bay, Chiba University, Chiba
Japan, June 27, 1999.
Presented
at the 1999 Chiba Conference on the future of the Sanbanze Wetlands
of Tokyo Bay. Tracks four rounds of planning for the San Francisco
Estuary. Round 1 focuses on the creation of the Bay Conservation
and Development Commission to regulate bay fill. Round 2 covers
the San Francisco Estuary Project. Round 3 is the Wetlands Goals
Project. Round 4 is the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. Concludes
with a list of questions for consideration by Japanese citizens,
scientists, and elected officials regarding planning for wetlands
and estuaries in Japan. |
|
R-99-03 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Facilitating
Negotiated Agreements to Restore the Environmental Quality
of the San Francisco Estuary. Scott T. McCreary, John Gamman,
Lisa Whitman, and Austin McInerny. From Democratic Design
in the Pacific Rim: Japan, Taiwan, and the United States,
pp.134-161. Edited by Randolph T. Hester and Corrina Kweskin.
Saline, Michigan, 1999.
Presented
at the 1998 Pacific Rim Conference on Public Participation and
Planning, convened at UC Berkeley. Presents three case studies
of CONCUR's work crafting agreements involving complex issues
and multiple parties. Case 1 involves policies for land use
adjacent to the San Francisco Estuary. Case 2 involves a dialogue
regarding copper reduction in the South Bay. Case 3 reviews
the independent scientific review of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program.
The paper concludes with advice for successful facilitation
of environmental disputes |
|
R-99-04 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Negotiating
Agreements for Integrated Flood Control: Guadalupe River Flood
Control Project Collaborative Santa Clara Valley, California.
Scott McCreary and Austin McInerny. From Proceedings of the
1999 APA National Planning Conference, April 28, 1999. Edited
by the American Planning Association, Chicago, IL, 1999.
Presented
at the 1999 American Planning Association Annual Conference.
A case study presentation focusing on CONCUR's facilitation
and mediation of the Guadalupe River Flood Control Project.
Details the step-by-step process of agreement-building among
diverse interests and the process by which joint fact-finding
was used to evaluate and select a preferred project. |
|
R-99-05 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Identifying
and Overcoming Obstacles to Resolving Cross-Cultural Disputes.
John K. Gamman. From Cultural Survival, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1995.
This
article discusses the relationship of culture to environmental
negotiations, and the importance of the "culture of decision-making."
Included in the article are two case studies of environmental
negotiations in the Caribbean. Finally, the author examines
how to create negotiated partnerships for sustainable development. |
|
R-95-01 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Independent
Fact-Finding as a Catalyst for Cross-Cultural Dialogue: Assessing
Impacts of Oil and Gas Development in Ecuador's Oriente Region.
Scott T. McCreary. From Cultural Survival, Vol. 19, No. 3,
1995.
Reviews
the author's experience on a team that conducted an independent
review of environmental impacts associated with oil and gas
exploration in Ecuador's Oriente (Amazon) region. Examined in
the article are the strategies used for framing the issue for
investigation, information gathering methods used to redress
power imbalances, and the presentation of and response to the
Independent Review Team's report. Concludes with recommendations
for using an independent review team model to initiate cross-cultural
negotiation. |
|
R-95-02 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Facilitated
Negotiation: A New Solution for Dealing with Public Siting
Controversies. John K. Gamman and John C. Jostes. From MSW
Management, Elements, 1994.
Describes
problems with current and describes elements of developing a
new siting approach using consensus-based agreements. Discusses
critical elements in facility siting and preventing unstable
relationships between the parties. A consensual decision-making
process for siting controversial facilities is outlined, including
establishing key advisory groups, designing a facility-siting
dialogue, and transforming conflict into an opportunity to gain
agreements. |
|
R-94-01 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Battle
of the Bulging Metropolis: Negotiating Our Way into Infill.
Scott T. McCreary, John K. Gamman and Staci L. Lanza. From
On The Ground, Vol. 1, No. 1, Fall 1994.
Discusses
the steps to successful land-use dispute resolution, and describes
key factors to consider in choosing mediation. |
|
R-94-02 |
|
$4.00 |
|
A
Process for Incorporating Comparative Risk into Environmental
Policymaking in Louisiana. Regina Thompson, Paul H. Templet,
John K. Gamman, Scott T. McCreary, and Margaret A. Reams.
From Risk Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1994.
Examines
the procedures and findings of Louisiana's effort to bring together
scientific information and public perceptions in a comprehensive
risk analysis of pressing environmental problems. |
|
R-94-03 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Land
Use Change and Impacts on the San Francisco Estuary: A Regional
Assessment with National Policy Implications. Scott McCreary,
Robert Twiss, Bonita Warren, Carolyn White, Susan Huse, Kenneth
Gardels, and Dominic Roques. From Coastal Management, Vol.
20, 1992.
Reports
on the methods, findings, and policy implications of a major
study undertaken for the San Francisco Estuary Project. Summarizes
the legislative impetus for improved estuarine management. Also
included is a discussion of the authors' analysis of the effects
of land use change on the estuary, and how the findings relate
to several management options to help frame the debate over
estuarine management. |
|
R-92-01 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Prospects
for Transfer of the California Conservancy Model for Habitat
Restoration to Other Coastal States. Scott McCreary, Mark
Adams. From Coastal Management, Vol. 16, 1988.
This
paper considers unmet wetlands management needs that a Conservancy
could fulfill, identifies major obstacles that could block
creation of such a bureau, and suggests ways to overcome these
obstacles and proceed with state-sponsored programs of habitat
restoration.
|
|
R-88-01 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Techniques
for Resolving Coastal Resource Management Disputes Through
Negotiation. Lawrence Susskind and Scott McCreary. From APA
Journal, Summer 1985.
Presents
four case studies of nonadjudicatory approaches that have proven
successful in resolving coastal resource management disputes
in California, Massachusetts, and Oregon. Includes discussion
of the elements and aspects of the different approaches. Describes
four barriers to more widespread use of less adversarial forms
of dispute resolution and suggests ways of overcoming those
barriers. |
| R-85-01 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Other
Publications and Reports Order
Form
Borderless
Clashes: How to Understand and Manage Environmental Degradation
that Crosses National Borders. John K. Gamman, May 6, 1995.
Outlines
a presentation for the World Affairs Council Annual Conference
convened at Asilomar, California in 1995. The paper presents
six challenges for addressing global environmental problems,
and six ways to help resolve them. |
|
PR-95-01 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Meeting
the Challenges of Mediating Land Use and Environmental Disputes
in California in the 1990's. Scott McCreary, April 28, 1995.
Addresses
some of the special challenges and opportunities posed by the
mediation of land use disputes in California. It sets forth
some hopeful trends for land use mediation, and proposes a preliminary
agenda for encouraging land use and environmental mediation
in the state. |
|
PR-95-02 |
|
$4.00 |
|
Growth
Management: Impacts of Population Growth on Natural Resources
(Water, Air, and Land) in the San Francisco Bay Area
This
report, prepared for the Bay Vision 2020 Commission, includes
a comprehensive look at future water supply and demand in the
9 Bay Area counties. In addition, the paper documents the current
system of governance for air, water supply and water quality,
and land use. |
|
PR-90-01 |
|
$15.00 |
|
Resolving
Science-Intensive Public Policy Disputes: Reflections on the
New York Bight Initiative
|
| PR-99-01 |
|
$9.00 |
|
|
Managing
PCBs in the Hudson/Raritan Estuary and the New York Bight
System. Scott McCreary with Marc David Block and Marlene Mallner,
October 28, 1988.
This
paper consists of the 78-page negotiated single text of the
NYAS New York Bight Initiative. It represents the results of
a joint fact-finding process, and summarizes the sources and
effects of contaminants on the marine environment of the New
York Harbor region. Also included are 26 specific policy recommendations. |
|
PR-88-01 |
|
$9.50 |
|
The
Role of Negotiation in Environmental Management
Outlines
a a series of factors that have elevated the importance of negotiation
in the suite of tools in environmental management. |
|
TN-00-01 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Key
Principles to Consider in Structuring a Negotiation- Based
Process
Describes
in detail four principles that guide and structure an effective
negotiation. |
|
TN-00-02 |
|
$5.00 |
|
CONCUR's
Model for Building Stepwise Agreements
Outlines
key steps in the practical execution of a negotiation-based
process. |
|
TN-00-03 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Tips
for Preparing for a Multiparty Negotiation
Advises
negotiators on tactics and strategies for a face-to-face multi-party
negotiation. |
|
TN-00-04 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Pre-Negotiation
Preparation: Doing your Research
Outlines
preparatory steps to be taken in order to better understand
the negotiation setting.
|
| TN-00-05 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Pre-Negotiation
Preparation: Planning
Makes
recommendations for strategic, tactical, and administrative
planning prior to a negotiation. |
| TN-00-06 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Pre-Negotiation
Preparation: Stakeholder Analysis/ Conflict Assessment
Describes
the objectives and processes involved in an initial stakeholder
analysis and conflict assessment and their roles in preparing
for a negotiation.
|
| TN-00-07 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Pre-Negotiation
Preparation: Creating a Mission/ Ground Rules
Describes
the process of drafting and adopting formal mission statements
and ground rules prior to a negotiation, and includes examples
of such documents.
|
| TN-00-08 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Framing
the Agenda for an Environmental Negotiation
Outlines
three key stages in the process of setting the agenda prior
to an environmental negotiation.
|
| TN-00-09 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Mediated
Negotiation: Joint Fact-Finding
Outlines
the process and value of joint fact-finding as a model for
resolving factual debates and constructing the scientific
basis for policy decision-making.
|
| TN-00-10 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Mediated
Negotiation: Building a Single Text Negotiation Document
Describes
the steps involved in creating a single text document that
captures the contributions and viewpoints of all representatives
in a collaborative negotiation.
|
| TN-00-011 |
|
$5.00 |
|
|
Ratification
Discusses
how to use a ratification process as a means of formally binding
negotiation participants to an agreement and securing their
commitment to its implementation.
|
| TN-00-012 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Glossary
Defines
important terms used in a negotiation process.
|
| TN-00-013 |
|
$5.00 |
|
Resource
Guide
CONCUR
Resource Guide
This
annually updated guide is a compilation of resources for negotiation,
mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution.
Sections include information on professional organizations,
volunteer mediation opportunities, Bar Association ADR Committees,
graduate programs in dispute resolution, books, periodicals,
journals and newsletters. |
|
RG-00-01 |
|
$15.00 |
|
|
|
