
Course Participant
Commentary About the CONCUR Instructors
|
|
<--Back
to Professional Development Courses
|
|
Overall Course Commentary
- "This is the most useful
training I have ever received. I feel confident that I will be able
to apply what I learned immediately. You have also set me on a continual
learning path in this approach and skill set. What an accomplishment
in two days."
|
Scott
McCreary
- Scott is an excellent teacher. He radiates authority of the subject.
He is well organized, quick to grasp and ready to answer questions and
is encouraging to class members.
- Scott is clearly a master
in the field.
- Scott is clear, concise
and direct - you "herd" a group of individuals well.
- Scott is an excellent public speaker and his expertise of the subject
matter is apparent in a relaxed yet professional and thorough style
of presentation.
- Scott is great, he strongly communicates a feeling of interest in
each comment and is good at encouraging discussion while still keeping
to the agenda. I enjoyed the constant real world examples.
- Scott's teaching is nicely done and keeps one's interest. There is
a good use of humor coupled with rigorous discussion and expectations.
- Scott is very articulate, business-like and clear. He is very encouraging.
He sets up a crisp pace of work.
- Excellent! Scott did a great job in encouraging discussion while keeping
the course on track. In teaching this course, he modeled a lot of elements
for a good facilitator.
|
John
Gamman
- John is a very effective instructor; his passion was evident and inspirational
in his 'tell it how it is' style.
- John has insightful observations
- another master.
- Your softer style was a
fine counterpoint. I'm impressed with your "theoretical burn" for the
practice.
- John is great; He is very adept at keeping things moving and giving
examples while engaging participants in dialogue and is very good at
summing things up.
- John's style is excellent. His teaming with Scott is nicely orchestrated.
Good modeling.
- I appreciated his humor and anecdotes. He plays well off Scott. I
can just imagine you two co-mediating.
- John is very interesting and an entertaining speaker. He is also very
personable.
- John is very helpful in providing advice to the facilitators during
the simulations in a non-critical manner.
|
Bennett
Brooks
- Bennett listens well and
picks up on what participants are really asking about. He has a good
command of the material and is a good communicator.
- Bennett is very articulate
and organized. I especially liked that he used real experience to flesh
out slides, and I also liked that he handled all questions possible,
and gave considered answers.
- Bennett has a good presentation
style - well modulated and thorough and responsive.
- Bennett has very good coaching
skills. He has good ideas on how to facilitate a process improvement.
- Bennett has a very effective
style and nurturing type of personality for teaching.
- Bennett has a quick mind.
He provides excellent feedback.
- Bennett is easy going; He
did a good job of sharing information and engaging with course participants.
- Bennett brought a great
and different perspective to the course.
|
|
Eric Poncelet
- Eric is a well organized
and effective presenter. His willingness to share his personal experience
as a mediator brought a "real life" quality to the presentation.
- Eric's presentation was
informative and knowledgeable.
- Eric is well spoken; he
makes effective replies to specific quesitons.
- Eric has very good insights
into the negotiation topics.
- Eric is very encouraging
and good at providing guidance.
|
|
|
| |
|
Back
to Professional Development Courses
|