Course Participant Commentary About the CONCUR Instructors

<--Back to Professional Development Courses 

Overall Course Commentary

  • "This is the most useful training I have ever received. I feel confident that I will be able to apply what I learned immediately. You have also set me on a continual learning path in this approach and skill set. What an accomplishment in two days."
Scott McCreary
  • Scott is an excellent teacher. He radiates authority of the subject. He is well organized, quick to grasp and ready to answer questions and is encouraging to class members.
  • Scott is clearly a master in the field.
  • Scott is clear, concise and direct - you "herd" a group of individuals well.
  • Scott is an excellent public speaker and his expertise of the subject matter is apparent in a relaxed yet professional and thorough style of presentation.
  • Scott is great, he strongly communicates a feeling of interest in each comment and is good at encouraging discussion while still keeping to the agenda. I enjoyed the constant real world examples.
  • Scott's teaching is nicely done and keeps one's interest. There is a good use of humor coupled with rigorous discussion and expectations.
  • Scott is very articulate, business-like and clear. He is very encouraging. He sets up a crisp pace of work.
  • Excellent! Scott did a great job in encouraging discussion while keeping the course on track. In teaching this course, he modeled a lot of elements for a good facilitator.
John Gamman
  • John is a very effective instructor; his passion was evident and inspirational in his 'tell it how it is' style.
  • John has insightful observations - another master.
  • Your softer style was a fine counterpoint. I'm impressed with your "theoretical burn" for the practice.
  • John is great; He is very adept at keeping things moving and giving examples while engaging participants in dialogue and is very good at summing things up.
  • John's style is excellent. His teaming with Scott is nicely orchestrated. Good modeling.
  • I appreciated his humor and anecdotes. He plays well off Scott. I can just imagine you two co-mediating.
  • John is very interesting and an entertaining speaker. He is also very personable.
  • John is very helpful in providing advice to the facilitators during the simulations in a non-critical manner.
Bennett Brooks
  • Bennett listens well and picks up on what participants are really asking about. He has a good command of the material and is a good communicator.
  • Bennett is very articulate and organized. I especially liked that he used real experience to flesh out slides, and I also liked that he handled all questions possible, and gave considered answers.
  • Bennett has a good presentation style - well modulated and thorough and responsive.
  • Bennett has very good coaching skills. He has good ideas on how to facilitate a process improvement.
  • Bennett has a very effective style and nurturing type of personality for teaching.
  • Bennett has a quick mind.  He provides excellent feedback.
  • Bennett is easy going; He did a good job of sharing information and engaging with course participants.
  • Bennett brought a great and different perspective to the course.

 

Eric Poncelet

  • Eric is a well organized and effective presenter. His willingness to share his personal experience as a mediator brought a "real life" quality to the presentation.
  • Eric's presentation was informative and knowledgeable.
  • Eric is well spoken; he makes effective replies to specific quesitons.
  • Eric has very good insights into the negotiation topics.
  • Eric is very encouraging and good at providing guidance.

 

 

Back to Professional Development Courses